如何缩短《Science China Chemistry》杂志的审稿周期？

想要缩短《Science China Chemistry》杂志的审稿周期需要作者、编辑部和审稿人等多方面的共同努力，作者可以采取一些有效措施，间接地加快审稿进度，提升稿件的处理效率。

建议如下：

一、提高论文质量

（1）严格遵循投稿要求：在投稿前，仔细阅读《Science China Chemistry》杂志的投稿指南，包括格式要求、字数限制、参考文献格式等。确保稿件符合杂志的规范，避免因格式问题被退回修改，从而耽误时间。

（2）提高论文质量：确保论文的研究内容具有创新性和学术价值，数据准确，论证严谨，语言表达清晰流畅。高质量的稿件更容易通过初审，进入同行评审阶段。

二、选择合适的投稿时机

（1）关注期刊审稿周期：在投稿前，了解《Science China Chemistry》杂志的审稿周期（预计1-3个月）和发表周期（月刊），以便合理安排投稿时间。

（2）关注期刊动态：了解期刊的专题征稿或热点话题，针对性地投稿，可能获得优先处理。

三、与编辑部保持良好沟通

（1）主动了解审稿进度：如果超过预计的审稿时间仍未收到回复，可以礼貌地向编辑部发送邮件，询问稿件的审稿进度。

（2）尊重审稿意见：认真对待审稿意见，积极修改论文中的不足之处，共同探讨论文的改进方向。

需要注意的是，缩短审稿周期的前提是保证稿件的质量，不能为了追求速度而牺牲学术严谨性。

《Science China Chemistry》杂志创刊于1950年，是由中国科学院主管、中国科学院主办的学术理论月刊。国内刊号CN：11-5838/O6，国际刊号ISSN：1674-7224。该杂志以推动科技改革与发展、探索科技规律为宗旨，致力于为科技工作者、研究者和管理者提供一个学术交流的平台。

《Science China Chemistry》杂志投稿建议：

Manuscript submission

Please provide in a cover letter the background, innovative and scientific value of the work presented in the manuscript, and authors’ publications related to this work. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is re-quired. (Please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting emails and addresses.) The authors may

recommend 3–8 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to make evaluation of the sub-mitted manuscript.

Duplicate submission is forbidden and unethical. In such cases, the journal will inform the institution of the authors and the relevant journal(s).

Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to rejection.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of science and the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publica-tion Ethics (COPE), the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

1.The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

2.The manuscript has not been published previously (part-ly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”).)

3.A single study is not split up into several parts to in-crease the quantity of submissions and submitted to var-ious journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “sala-mi-publishing”).

4.No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. Upon request au-thors should be prepared to submit relevant documenta-tion or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of, e.g., raw data, samples, and records.

5.No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors’ own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given, in-cluding material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased. Quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions need to be secured for material that is copyrighted.

Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

6.Consent to submit, including each version of the paper and any change in authorship, has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/ organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted or re-submitted for publication. In addition, authorship changes or the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of a written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision whether to accept the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

7.Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and there-fore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

声明：以上内容来源于互联网公开资料，如有不准确之处，请联系我们进行修改。